Skip to main content

Posts

Showing posts from November, 2024

Types of Writs According to the Constitution of Pakistan

In the field of law, protecting citizens’ rights is of utmost importance. One of the tools provided by the Constitution of Pakistan to safeguard these rights is the issuance of writs. A writ is a formal legal order issued by a court, commanding an individual, organization, or government to act—or stop acting—in a particular way. These writs are a cornerstone of justice, ensuring that authorities and institutions follow the rule of law. By Adv. Waseem Latif Contact: 03440444440   Definition of Writ A writ is a legal remedy issued by a higher court (such as a High Court or the Supreme Court) when someone’s fundamental rights are violated, or a public authority acts unlawfully. Writs serve as a direct way for courts to enforce justice and maintain accountability. The Constitution of Pakistan specifically empowers the High Courts to issue writs under Article 199 . Five Types of Writs 1. Habeas Corpus – Safeguarding Freedom Definition : Habeas Corpus means "produce the body." P...

Assignment No. 1 by Tanveer Rasheed Joiya, Advocate High Court

Mistake of Fact: means that a person misunderstands a fact and acts based on that misunderstanding. Illustration: Suppose A enters a house, thinking it’s his friend’s place and he has permission to be there. Later, he finds out it was actually a stranger’s house. A made a mistake of fact because he believed he was in the right house. If A acted in good faith, he may not be held criminally responsible for trespassing. Mistake of Law: means that a person misunderstands or doesn’t know the law correctly. However, unlike a mistake of fact, a mistake of law usually does not protect someone from criminal liability. This is because everyone is expected to know and follow the law, and simply not understanding it is not an excuse. Illustration: Suppose A starts a gambling business, thinking it’s legal. Later, he finds out that gambling is actually prohibited by law. A made a mistake of law by misunderstanding what is legal, but he can still be held responsible for breaking the law, as not...